Patent Interference No. 103,892 Page 2 ____________ FINAL HEARING: December 5, 2002 ____________ Before GRON, WARREN, and LORIN, Administrative Patent Judges. LORIN, Administrative Patent Judge. FINAL DECISION This interference involves: • Davie et al. (Davie) – Serial No. 08/169,749, filed 12/17/93; • Davie et al. (Davie) – Serial No. 08/175,717, filed 12/30/93; and, • Grundmann et al. (Grundmann) – Serial No. 08/032,171, filed 3/12/93. Grundmann has been accorded the benefit of an earlier filing date.4 Accordingly, Grundmann is designated the senior party in this interference. 37 CFR §§ 1.657 and 1.601(m). 4 Davie application 08/169,749 has been accorded the benefit of the • October 1, 1991 filing date of earlier Davie application 07/769,473; • March 28, 1988 filing date of earlier Davie application 07/174,287; and, • September 19, 1986 filing date of earlier Davie application 06/909,512. Davie application 08/175,717 has been accorded the benefit of the • December 17, 1993 filing date of earlier Davie application 08/169,749; • October 1, 1991 filing date of earlier Davie application 07/769,473; • March 28, 1988 filing date of earlier Davie application 07/174,287; and, • September 19, 1986 filing date of earlier Davie application 06/909,512. Grundmann application 08/032,171 has been accorded the benefit of the • July 9, 1990 filing date of earlier Grundmann application 07/549,234; • March 10, 1987 filing date of earlier Grundmann application 07/024,174; • June 26, 1986 filing date of earlier Grundmann priority application DE 3621371.3. See paper nos. 1 and 2 declaring the interference.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007