AKITADA et al v. AKITADA et al v. GRUNDMANN et al - Page 3




                Patent Interference No. 103,892                                                        Page 3                           


                      The following count defines the interfering subject matter:                                                       
                                                                Count 1                                                                 
                                           An isolated DNA encoding human factor XIII.                                                  

                      The parties’ claims5 which have been designated to correspond to Count 1 are:                                     
                • Davie ‘749 application: claims 7, 9, 16-17, 23-25, 27, 29, 31, 37, 39-40, 44-45;                                      
                • Davie ‘717application: claims 36-40; and,                                                                             
                • Grundmann ‘171 application: 30-32.                                                                                    

                      The parties filed the following briefs and supporting documents:                                                  
                • Davie:                                                                                                                
                   o Brief (paper no. 35)                                                                                               
                   o “Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” (paper no. 34)                                                  
                   o Record w/ Tabs A-H (paper no. 78)                                                                                  
                   o Documents w/ Tabs 1-9 (paper no. 79)                                                                               
                • Grundmann:                                                                                                            
                   o “Reply Brief” [sic, Brief]  (paper no. 41)                                                                         
                   o Record w/ Tabs 1-8 (paper no. 32)                                                                                  
                   o Documents w/ Tabs 1-2 (paper no. 33)                                                                               
                • Davie                                                                                                                 
                   o Reply Brief (paper no. 59)                                                                                         




                                                                                                                                        
                5 No party has an allowed claim that has been designated not to correspond to the count (see paper                      
                nos. 1 and 2). However, claims 26,28,30 and 32-36 of Davie application ‘749 have been indicated as                      
                unpatentable by the examiner and remain pending.                                                                        








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007