ROSENTHAL v. MAGEE - Page 47




              Interference No. 104,403                                                                                     

                        Rosenthal testifies that on August 14, 1992, prior to the filing                                   
                 date of the Magee ‘525, he prepared a prototype which is depicted in                                      
                 Exhibit 2142 with conic lenses on the viewing surface and spaced-                                         
                 apart, raised parallel portions with composite image thereupon and                                        
                 indented transparent concave lenses in between which permitted the                                        
                 passage of light (Rosenthal Record pages 34 to 35).  Rosenthal also                                       
                 testifies that he met with Lauter and showed him the prototype of his                                     
                 lenticular convex/concave sheet (Rosenthal Record page 35).   In                                          
                 addition, Dr. Lauter testified that in the prototype he viewed on August                                  
                 14, 1992 a viewer could see the sheet appear as an opaque image                                           
                 material at one angle of view and then from another angle of view, see                                    
                 the sheet as transparent, thereby providing a clear view through the                                      
                 sheet to objects behind it (Rosenthal Record page 14).  Lauter also                                       
                 testifies that he viewed Rosenthal’s packaging in which the lens sheet                                    
                 was used as a window and provided a view of an opaque image at                                            
                 one angle and a clear view at another angle through to the actual                                         
                 contents of the package (Rosenthal Record page 14).                                                       


                        In our view, the junior party’s priority evidence establishes that                                 
                 he had reduced the invention of claims 3 and 11 prior to the effective                                    
                 date of the Magee ‘525 reference.                                                                         

                                                      47                                                                   





Page:  Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007