Interference No. 104,403 the images of the composite image, it is necessary to change the other image as well. At col. 3, lines 13 to 16, Rosenthal ‘727 teaches that the use of independent replaceable composite images allows one to replace one of the images on the surface without replacing the second image. In our view, a person of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to modify the invention reduced to practice to obtain the advantage of being able to replace one of the images which forms the composite image without replacing the other image. Rosenthal ‘727 teaches that the images on a lenticular lens may be formed by printing, i.e. applying ink to the lenticular lens itself (col. 5, lines 46 to 52). U.S. Patent No. 4,920,039 to Fotland at col. 4, lines 28 to 31; col. 5, lines 3 to 6; Fig. 1 teaches that pigment may be applied to a planar portion of a lenticular lens sheet to form the image in a lenticular lens system. It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to form the image of the invention reduced to practice on August 14, 1992 by transferring ink to the planar portions as recited in claim 4 as this was a well known way of forming the image as evidenced by the teachings of Rosenthal ‘727 and Fotland. The feature recited in claims 6 and 8 of utilizing a plurality of parallel diffractive lenses on a lenticular sheet would have been obvious in view of the teaching in the prior art such as U.S. Patent 4,993,790 49Page: Previous 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007