NICHOLS et al. V. TABAKOFF et al. - Page 27





             Interference No. 104,522 PaperIO8                                                                               
             Nichols v. Tabakoff Page 27                                                                                     
             Paper 107, p. 12,11. 6-22). Nichols stated that the lab notebook (Ex 2024) "obviously is                        

             not proof of that that [94B-32-111] was synthesized" (id., p. 13,11. 1-6). Nichols further                      

             stated that "...what Dr. Seifert testified was that the [diphenyl] structure that was                           

             [subsequently] drawn [by Dr. Nichols] on the sheet was consistent with the mass                                 

             spectral data. So it's indicative that that product was actually synthesized" (id., p. 14, 11.                  

             6-19). However, when it was put to Nichols that "what he [Dr. Seifert] said was that the                        

             mass spec data was consistent with the structure or that the structure was not                                  

             inconsistent with the data. But he did not say that spectra [sic] is that structure" (Ld., p.                   

             14,1. 20 - p. 15,1. 2), Nichols replied "That's correct. But he did say that there's only so                    

             many structures that it could be" (Ld., p. 15,11. 3-5) (see also id., p. 18,11. 7-19). When                     

             asked if Dr. Seifert gave any indication of about how many possible structures there                            

             were, Nichols replied "[w]hat they were specifically talking about was one other                                

             possibility. They did not go into questioning how may possibilities there were." (id,, p.                       

             15,1. 6 - p. 16, 1. 3). As to that at least one other structure, Nichols stated that it would                   

             be-outside the interference count (id., 16, 1. 7 - p. 17, 1. 10). Finally, Nichols stated that                  

             the NIH submission Exs 2040 and E (Ex 2035) "showed that at the time it [94B-32-111]                            

             was submitted to NIH, Dr. Nichols did believe that that was what the structure was. And                         

             that was based on the mass spectral data" (Ld., p. 17,1. 13 - p. 18,1. 6).                                      

             63. Mr. Stables testified that                                                                                  

                     ...Exhibit E is a copy of an Antiepileptic Drug Development (ADD)                                        
                     Registration Record (2 pages) that was received from Dr. A] Nichols and                                 
                     processed by NIH on August 30, 1994. The ADD Registration Record is                                     
                     for the compound identified as 94B-32-1 11 by Dr. Nichols and assigned                                  
                     identification number ADD 236075 by NIH. The ADD Registration Record                                    
                     includes a structural drawing of the compound as provided by Dr. Nichols.                               








Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007