NICHOLS et al. V. TABAKOFF et al. - Page 23




              Interference No. 104,522 Paper108                                                                                            
              Nichols v. Tabakoff Page 23                                                                                                  
              substances acting by different mechanisms of action.                                                                         
              50. Dr. Nichols testified that a test report accompanied the September 2, 1994 letter                                        
              (Ex D) (NR, p. 111, 11. 7-19), which report has been identified as Ex 2059.                                                  
              51. The NIH test report Ex 2059 is a two page document containing MIES and TTE                                               
              test data for ADD 236001, respectively. The MIES data page has a handwritten entry                                           
              "94B-27-l." The TTE data page has a handwritten circle drawn around the column                                               
              under 2 hours and a handwritten chemical structure labeled 94B-27-1 at the bottom.                                           
              52. The handwritten entries on Ex 2059 were made by Dr. Nichols (NR, p. 112,                                                 
              1. 11 - p. 113,1. 8).                                                                                                        
              53. Neither test procedure, i.e., MES or TTE, nor its test results has been explained.                                       
              At best, Mr. Stables indicated in the September 2, 1994 letter (Ex D) that although ADD                                      
              236001 was active at 2 hours in the TTE test, the activity was not potent enough to                                          
              warrant further study.                                                                                                       
                       Dr. Nichols stated that he sent 100 mg of sample 94121-27-1 to Dr. Snell for                                        
              ..pharmacological" testing. However, Nichols has not pointed to, and we do not find,                                         
              where evidence of the exact nature and results of such "pharmacological" testing of                                          
              sample 9413-27-1 by Dr. Snell is of record.                                                                                  
                                               L analysis of evidence                                                                      
                       Notebook Ex 2022, taken alone, is insufficient to establish that the predicted                                      
              reactions and theoretically expected products did in fact occur. It appears that an                                          
              intervening page, i.e., 9413-23, should have been included in Ex 2022 given the                                              
              reference to page 23 on the second page of Ex 2022 and the reference to sample "23-                                          








Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007