THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper 58
Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
MAILED
BAHMAN HESI-IMATPOUR
APR 2 9 2003
Junior Party, PAT & TM. OFFICE j c
(Application 09/020,616), 8 0 A RFD D 0 P0 F PATENT; A P P EA L S
AND INTERFERENCESNO I Tjý 003
V.
JOSEPH A. MEGY
Senior Party,
(Patent 5,935,295).
Patent Interference No. 104,622
Before: SCHAFER, SPIEGEL and LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINAL JUDGMENT
This interference is between Application 09/020,616 of Bahman Heshmatpour and Patent
5,935,295 issued to Joseph A. Megy.1 We award judgment against Dr. Heshmatpour. Dr.
While both parties were at one time represented by counsel, both now proceed pro se.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007