F 97. The Ganzler publication does not mention the use of a vacuum or reduced pressure in
preparing chromatography samples.
F 98. Par6 has not provided any evidence explaining the content of the Ganzler publication from
the perspective of a person having ordinary skill in the microwave extraction art.
F 99. Par6 has not provided any evidence showing the ideal gas equation applies to the complex
closed system described by Ganzler.
F 100. The Ganzler publication has not been shown to inherently describe applying vacuum or
reduced pressure during microwave treatment.
3) The Wennerstrum Patent
F 101. The Wennerstrum patent does not expressly describe "intermittently applying a vacuum to
the biological material" or "intermittently applying reduced pressure."
F 102. Par6 has not provided any testimony or other evidence explaining how the Wenner-strum
patent would be understood by a person having ordinary skill in the microwave extraction
art.
F 103. Par6 has not provided any evidence showing that one having ordinary skill in the art would
understand Wermerstrum's description of maintaining a "constant reduced pressure" to
necessarily describe "intermittently applying reduced pressure" or "intermittently applying
vacuum."
F 104. The Wennerstrurn patent has not been shown to inherently describe intermittently applying
reduced pressure or vacuum.
e. Conveying an Azeotropic Mixture and Separation from the
Mixture
F 105. With respect to the limitation requiring conveying an azeotropic mixture including the
natural product and separating the product from the azeotrope, Par6 argues:
One of ordinary skill in the art would realize that the formation of an
azeotropic mixture will depend on the inherent nature or ability of the
specific natural product released to form an azeotropic mixture with
water ....
-14-
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007