Ex Parte PARE - Page 16



                                                         the microwave radiation effective to split the                          
                                                                cellular structure of the biological                             
                                                                material;                                                        
                                   intermittently applying reduced pressure within the enclosure                                 
                                          during the application of microwave radiation                                          
                                                 to further split the cellular structure of the biological                       
                                                         material induced by application of the                                  
                                                         microwave radiation;                                                    
                                   hydrodistilling the natural product                                                           
                                          by conveying                                                                           
                                                 the natural product and                                                         
                                                 the water vapor coming from the biological material                             
                                                 as an azeotropic: mixture; and                                                  
                                   separating the natural product from the azeotropic mixture.                                   
                    At least two limitations present in Mengal's claims are not expressly taught by the Par6                     
             patents. At least one of these limitations is present in each of Mengal's claims. The first requires                
             the intermittent application of reduced pressure (or vacuum) during the exposure to microwaves.                     
             Mengal Claims 1-5, 8, 9, 11, 14-21, 23-30 and 32 include this limitation. The other limitation                      
             specifies conveying the natural product and water volatilized by the application of microwaves as                   
             an azeotropic mixture and separating the product form the azeotrope. This limitation is present in                  
             Mengal Claims 20, 2 1, and 23-32.                                                                                   
                                   a. Intermittent Application of Reduced Pressure                                               
                    With respect to the intermittent application of vacuum or reduced pressure during the                        
             application of microwaves, Par& argues that this limitation is inherent in Example 2 of both Par6                   
             patents.                                                                                                            
                                          1) Inherency                                                                           
                    Inherency is a question of fact. In re Schreibgr, 128 F.3d 1473, 1477, 44 USPQ2d 1429,                       
             1431 (Fed. Cir. 1997); In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794, 215 USPQ 569, 571 (CCPA 1982). To                       
             establish inherency, extrinsic evidence must make clear that the missing descriptive matter is                      
             necessarily present in the disclosure and that it would be so recognized by persons of ordinary skill.              
             Continental Can Co. v. Monsanto Co., 948 F.2d 1264,1268-69,20 USPQ2d 1746,1749 (Fed. Cir.                           
             1991). Proof of inherency requires evidence that the "necessary and only reasonable construction                    
             to be given the disclosure by one skilled in the art is one which will lend clear support to ...[the]                    

                                                          -16-                                                                   






Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007