The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper88 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed Washington, D.C. 20231 18 March 2003 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFI E MAILED BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS MAR 1 8 2003 AND INTERFERENCES PAT 8, TM OFFICE BOARD OF PATiNTAPPEALS AND INTERFERENCES NIKOLAI S. STRELCHENKO, JEFFREY M. BETTHAUSER, GAIL L. JURGELLA, MARVIN M. PACE and MICHAEL D. BISHOP, Junior Party, (Application 09/357,445), V. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, Senior Party (Patents 5,945,577 and 6,215,041 and 6,235,969). Patent Interference 104,808 Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judg . DECISION ON UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS'PRELIMINARY MOTION NO. 1 AND FINAL JUDGMENT The University of Massachusetts (Stice) has filed a preliminary motion seeking ajudgment that all of Strelchenko's involved claims are barred by the provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 135(b)(1). Paper 23. An oral argument on the motion was held on March 10, 2003. We grant the motion and enter judgment against Strelchenko.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007