VAN ENGELEN et al. V. LEE - Page 22




                        Even still, the exhibits 2034 and 2035, which are schematics, do not by themselves                                        
               explain how elements are connected and how the elements function. In that light, van Engelen                                       
               relies on the declaration of Dr. Kurfess to explain what exhibits 2034 and 2035 describe and that                                  
               the Micrascan 11 system shown in those exhibits anticipates Lee claims 2 and 8. Dr. Kurfess is                                     
               said to be an expert of metrology systems. We do not know, however, how his experience                                             
               pertains to photolithography systems or positioning devices as claimed in Lee claims 2 and 8.                                      
               Neither van Engelen nor Dr. Kurfess tells us. Still further, Dr. Kurfess apparently has no first                                   
               hand knowledge of the Micrascan H device that was sold. That is, Dr. Kurfess' testimony is                                         
               based on his independent review of the schematics and photos submitted into evidence by van                                        
               Engelen (Ex. 2012 at 69). Absent from the record is an explanation supporting Kurfess'                                             
               conclusion that he has drawn with respect to how the elements shown in exhibits 2034 and 2035                                      
               are connected and how the elements function. For example, Dr. Kurfess testified that "in the                                       
               Micrascan H, there was a wafer stage interferometer system including a wafer stage IF                                              
               (interferometer) module 280 and wafer IF L-shaped mirror 240 for measuring the position of the                                     
               wafer stage table relative to the projection optics system 110. (Exh. 2034: MS H FIG. 1; 2035:                                     
               MS Il FIG. 2)" (Ex. 2012 TJ 75 and 86).                                                                                            
                        It is not apparent from either of exhibits 2034 or 2035 that the module 280 and mirror 240                                
               cooperate to measure the position of the wafer stage table relative to the proiection optics system                                
               110 as recited in Lee claims 2 and 8. Dr. Kurfess does not explain how it is so. Kurfess'                                          
               statements that the module 280 and mirror 240 function to measure the position of the wafer                                        
               stage table relative to the projection optics system 110 are conclusory and unsupported                                            
               assertions. Nothing in the Federal Rules of Evidence (applicable to patent interference cases) or                                  

                                                                     -22-                                                                         






Page:  Previous  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007