VAN ENGELEN et al. V. LEE - Page 28





                demonstrate that it would not have been obvious to combine the Schutten actuator system to a                                         
                two frame system.                                                                                                                    
                         Schutten discloses a force actuator system, with force actuators 74, 76 in between the                                      
                ground and a work table (frame). Thus, Schutten discloses a force actuator in between two                                            
                structures. Van Engelen has failed to sufficiently demonstrate that one of ordinary skill would                                      
                not look to Schutten to teach placing force actuators in between two frames. Specifically, van                                       
                Engelen fails to explain why Schutten's force actuators would not work in between two frames.                                        
                Schutten teaches a force actuator system for compensating for forces acting on the frame                                             
                (stage/table), or for tilting of the frame and for movement of the stage. Based on the record                                        
                before us, such a system teaches a compensation system regardless of whether that system is                                          
                placed in between two frames, or in between a frame and the ground. Note, absent from van                                            
                Engelen's claims 4, 7, and 10 is a requirement that the compensation force compensate for                                            
                reaction forces in a second frame. Rather the claims recite that the compensation force                                              
                compensate for forces of gravity acting on the object table (substrate table/mask table). Schutten                                   
                apparently compensates for such forces. Van Engelen has failed to direct us to evidence that                                         
                demonstrates otherwise.                                                                                                              

                         Van Engelen argues that the prior art fails to disclose a compensation force exerted in                                     
                response to gravity forces on two moving stages as recited in claim 10 (opposition at 20). Claim                                     
                10 recites that the mechanical moments of the forces of gravity for both the mask table and                                          
                substrate table are added in determining the opposing compensation force exerted on the                                              
                reference frame. Van Engelen argues that Schutten only provides background information and                                           
                does not teach a compensation force in response to gravity forces exerted on a substrate stage and                                   
                a mask stage (opposition at 21). Van Engelen's response is dissatisfying.                                                            

                         In its preliminary motion, Lee explains that van Engelen claim 9 recites that the mask                                      
                table and the substrate table are both supported on a common frame - the reference frame. The                                        


                                                                      -28-                                                                           







Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007