1995. Furthermore, van Engelen's preliminary motion 6, attacking the benefit accorded Lee is
denied. Accordingly, judgment is entered against junior party van Engelen. Itis
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count is herein entered against
junior party GERARD VAN ENGELEN, FRANK B. SPERLING, HENRICUS W. A.
JANSSEN, ADIANUS G. BOUWER, CORNELIS D. VAN DUK, JOHANNES M. M. VAN
KWIMENADE, JAN VAN EUK, and ADRIANUS VAN DER PAL;
FURTHER ORDERED junior party GERARD VAN ENGELEN, FRANK B.
SPERLING, HENRICUS W. A. JANSSEN, ADLA-NUS G. BOUWER, CORNELIS D. VAN
DUK, JOHANNES M. M. VAN KIMMENADE, JAN VAN EUK, and ADRIANLJS VAN DER
PAL is not entitled to its claims 1-11 which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.666; and
-33-
Page: Previous 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007