anticipation. Therefore, we need not and have not determined whether van Engelen has sufficiently demonstrated that the device sold was "ready for patenting." Since van Engelen has failed to meet its burden of proof to show that it is entitled to the relief sought, Lee's opposition need not and has not been considered. Van Engelen preliminary motion 5 is denied. With respect to the patentability of van Engelen's claims corresponding to the count over the Micrascan IJ device, we make no determination. Since judgment is concurrently entered against van Engelen based on priority, we need not decide the issue. Lee preliminaU motion 2 Through its preliminary motion 2, Lee seeks to designate van Engelen claims 4, 7 and 10 as corresponding to the count. Van Engelen claim 4 depends on van Engelen claim 3. Van Engelen claims 3 and 4 are as follows: 3. A positioning device as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the object table is displaccable over a guide parallel to at least an X-direction, the guide being fastened to the reference frame. 4. A positioning device as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the positioning device is provided with a force actuator system which is controlled by an electric control unit and which exerts a compensation force on the reference frame during operation, which compensation force has a mechanical moment about a reference point of the reference frame having a value equal to a value of a mechanical moment of a force of gravity acting on the object table about said reference point, and a direction which is opposed to a direction of the mechanical moment of said force of gravity. Van Engelen claim 7 depends on van Engelen claim 6, which depends on claim 5. Van Engelen claims 5-7 are as follows: 5. A lithographic device comprising a radiation source, a mask table, a projection system having a main axis, a substrate table, a drive unit for displacing the substrate table relative to the projection system in at least one direction perpendicular to the main axis, and a measuring system for measuring a position of the substrate table relative to the projection -24-Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007