Ex Parte TAKISHIMA et al - Page 1



         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was             
         not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the            
         Board.                                                                     
                                                           Paper No. 29             
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    __________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    __________                                      
                  Ex parte YASUHIRO TAKISHIMA, SHIGEYUKI SAKAZAWA,                  
                                  and MASAHIRO WADA                                 
                                    __________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-0745                                
                               Application 08/893,379                               
                                    ___________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ___________                                     
         Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and LEVY, Administrative Patent                
         Judges.                                                                    
         JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
                                                                                   
         This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134                     
         from the examiner=s rejection of claims 1-7, 9, 13-19 and 21.              
         Claims 8, 10-12, 20 and 22-24 have been allowed by the examiner.           
         The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                           
         apparatus for second or later generation coding of a video signal          
         in the field of tandem stage coding.  The invention is disclosed           
                                         1                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007