Appeal No. 2002-0745 Application 08/893,379 as providing a solution which will enable the encoding of a video signal which considers the coding history of the video signal when the actual coding parameters are not available. Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows: 1. A method for second or later generation coding of a video signal in tandem stage coding which includes a previous stage coding process and a later stage coding process which are separately and sequentially executed, comprising the steps of: estimating at least one coding parameter used in the previous stage coding process in accordance with picture properties of the video signal coded by said previous stage coding process; and secondly coding the video signal coded by said previous stage coding process, based upon the estimated coding parameter. The examiner relies on the following references: Trew 4,941,044 July 10, 1990 Fuchigama et al. (Fuchigama) 5,079,547 Jan. 07, 1992 Murakami et al. (Murakami) 5,367,335 Nov. 22, 1994 Tahara 5,412,428 May 02, 1995 Lin et al. (Lin) 5,485,214 Jan. 16, 1996 The following rejections are on appeal before us: 1. Claims 1 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Murakami. 2. Claims 9 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of Murakami taken alone. 3. Claims 2, 4-6, 14 and 16-18 stand rejected under 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007