Appeal No. 2002-0745
Application 08/893,379
35 U.S.C. ' 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Murakami in view of Lin.
4. Claims 3 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
' 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of Murakami and
Lin in view of Fuchigama and Tahara.
5. Claims 7 and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
' 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of Murakami and
Lin in view of Trew.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the examiner as
support for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and
taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the
appellants= arguments set forth in the briefs along with the
examiner=s rationale in support of the rejections and arguments
in rebuttal set forth in the examiner=s answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007