The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte NEZAR AHMED and NAGU SRINIVAS __________ Appeal No. 2002-2232 Application No. 09/174,032 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before LEE, MEDLEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges. MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 29-32 and 37. Claims 1-28 and 33-36 have been canceled. Thus, only claims 29-32 and 37, which have been finally rejected, are before us on this appeal. Claims 37 and 31 are representative. They read as follows.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007