Ex Parte AHMED et al - Page 1





          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not            
          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            
                                                              Paper No. 23              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                         
                                      __________                                        
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                            
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                        
                                 Ex parte NEZAR AHMED                                   
                                          and                                           
                                     NAGU SRINIVAS                                      
                                      __________                                        
                                 Appeal No. 2002-2232                                   
                              Application No. 09/174,032                                
                                      ___________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                         
                                      ___________                                       

          Before LEE, MEDLEY, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.                  
          MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                       
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                   
          rejection of claims 29-32 and 37.  Claims 1-28 and 33-36 have                 
          been canceled.  Thus, only claims 29-32 and 37, which have been               
          finally rejected, are before us on this appeal.  Claims 37 and                
          31 are representative.  They read as follows.                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007