Appeal No. 2002-2232 Application 09/174,032 Sedding et al. (Sedding) 5,475,312 Dec. 12, 1995 The Rejections Claims 37, 29 and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Rokunohe. Claims 31 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103(a) as being unpatentable over Rokunohe in view of Sedding. The Invention The invention relates to the detection of partial discharge events in power systems such as cables, motors, and transformers. More particularly, the invention relates to the detection of partial discharge events on-line while the power system is in operation. (Specification, page 1, lines 1-3). Further details of the claimed invention are seen with reference to the claims reproduced above. The Rejection of Claims 37, 29, and 30 Under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) The examiner has found that Rokunohe discloses: (a) detecting in a cable high-frequency electromagnetic pulses generated by partial discharge; (b) analyzing the pulses in the frequency domain to identify a frequency component of greatest magnitude and the frequency of the component; 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007