The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDGAR HOLMANN
and TOYOHIKO YOSHIDA
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2330
Application No. 09/116,260
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 36, 37 and 39-42. Claims
13, 15-17, 19, 21 and 22 have been allowed by the examiner.
Claim 38 has been objected to.
BACKGROUND
Appellants' invention relates to a microprocessor having
delayed instructions. An understanding of the invention can be
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007