Ex Parte ARMINGTON et al - Page 11




                  Appeal No. 2003-0204                                                                                      Page 11                       
                  Application No. 09/096,123                                                                                                              


                  from the appellants' own disclosure.  The use of such hindsight knowledge to support an                                                 
                  obviousness rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is, of course, impermissible.                                                               


                           For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 279                                             
                  to 284 and 287 to 294 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 279 to 284 and 287                                                 
                  to 294 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                                                               
                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              





                                             CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                  )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JOHN P. McQUADE                                       )         APPEALS                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )             AND                                      
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007