Ex Parte HANKS - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-1383                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/451,414                                                                                

                     Claim 1 is representative of the invention and reads as follows:                                   
              1.     An electronic read channel for an optical disk drive, the drive adapted for reading                
              and writing data, the channel comprising:                                                                 
                     an amplifier, having an input and an output;                                                       
                     a switch, the switch coupling the input of the amplifier to a data signal when the                 
                     drive is reading data, and the switch coupling the input of the amplifier to a                     
                     wobble signal when the drive is writing data; and                                                  
                     a phased locked loop, receiving a signal derived from a signal from the output of                  
                     the amplifier, the phased locked loop generating a read clock signal when the                      
                     drive is reading data, and the phased locked loop generating a write clock signal                  
                     when the drive is writing data.                                                                    
                                                      Reference                                                         
                     The examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence of obviousness:                       
              Katoh                                     6,088,311                          July 11, 2000                
                                                                                      (filed Jan. 9, 1998)              
                                                 Rejections at Issue                                                    
                     Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                     
              Appellant’s Admitted Prior Art (AAPA) in Figure 1 in view of Katoh.                                       
                                                       Opinion                                                          
                     We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections                          
              advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the                               
              examiner as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                       
              consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs1               

                                                                                                                        
              1 This decision is based upon the Appeal Brief received November 13, 2002 (certified as being             
              filed on November 6, 2002, in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 1.8(a)), and the Reply Brief received           
              February 21, 2003 (certified as being filed on February 13, 2003, in accordance with 37 C.F.R.            
              § 1.8(a)).                                                                                                
                                                          -2-                                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007