Ex Parte LUDDECKE et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2003-1721                                                                 Page 2               
              Application No. 09/226,143                                                                                


                                                   INTRODUCTION                                                         
                     The claims are directed to compositions containing carotenoid aggregates.  According to            
              Appellants, carotenoids occur widely in nature and are conventionally used to color foods,                
              cosmetics and nonfood articles (specification, p. 1, ll. 10-11).  Their use, however, is greatly          
              limited due to light and oxygen sensitivity (specification, p. 1, ll. 12-13).  Appellants indicate        
              that they have overcome the sensitivity problem by using carotenoids in their aggregated form             
              (specification, p. 1, ll. 21-22).  According to Appellants, it has now been found that, surprisingly,     
              carotenoid aggregates exhibit significantly better stability to light than monomeric carotenoids          
              (specification, p. 2, ll. 9-11).  Claims 6, 9, and 13 are representative of the subject matter on         
              appeal:                                                                                                   
                     6.   Drinks comprising carotenoid aggregates.                                                      
                     9.   Cosmetic or pharmaceutical preparations comprising carotenoid aggregates.                     
                     13.  A method of forming colored compositions of foods, cosmetics or pharmaceuticals               
                     comprising adding a carotenoid aggregate to said composition.                                      
                     The Examiner rejects all the claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of                      
              obviousness, the Examiner relies upon the following:                                                      
              Kitaoka et al. (Kitaoka)                  5,591,343                   Jan.  07, 1997                      
              Takagaki1                                 63-145,367                  Jun. 17, 1988                       
              (Japanese Pub. Application)                                                                               
              Statements in the specification at page 1, lines 25-36 (Statements in the Specification).                 

                     1We rely upon and cite to the English translation of record.                                       







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007