Ex Parte BAKER et al - Page 4




              Appeal No. 2003-1736                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/123,137                                                                                  
              page 5, the formation of primary adhesions depends on the persistence of fibrin bridges                     
              between the disjoint parts, which are subsequently colonized by other cells and develop                     
              into permanent vascularized tissue.  Secondary adhesions may be the result of the                           
              normal healing process which involves the mobilization of several cell types and the                        
              formation of new collagen and typically has initial stages lasting for up to two weeks                      
              followed by several months of maturation.  Id.                                                              
              Obviousness-type Double Patenting                                                                           
                     Claims 1, 9-25 and 27-30 stand rejected for obviousness-type double patenting                        
              over claims 1-42 of U.S. Patent No. 5,785,993.                                                              
                     The examiner argues that although the conflicting claims are not identical they                      
              are not patentably distinct from one another because the instant generic terminology                        
              encompasses the fluid composition and the specific oxygen inhibitors in the claims of                       
              the patent.                                                                                                 
                     Appellants have indicated in their brief the willingness to file a terminal disclaimer               
              once the claims have been determined to be otherwise allowable.  Brief, page 15.                            
              In as much as no terminal disclaimer has been made of record to date, the rejection for                     
              obviousness-type double patenting is affirmed.                                                              


              35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                                             
                     Claims 1, 9-25 and 27-30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sawhney 1,                        
              Hettinger by themselves or together, in further combination with applicants’ statement of                   

                                                            4                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007