Appeal No. 2003-1736 Application No. 09/123,137 CONCLUSION The rejection of claims 1, 9-25 and 27-30 for obviousness-type double patenting over claims 1-42 of U.S. Patent No. 5,785,993 is affirmed. The rejection of claims 1, 9- 25 and 27-30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Sawhney 1, Hettinger by themselves or together, in further combination with applicants’ statement of prior art and optionally in further combination with WO 93/17669 and Sawhney 2 is reversed. AFFIRMED ) TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT DEMETRA J. MILLS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) ERIC GRIMES ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007