The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK T. GROSS
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0434
Application No. 09/836,686
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, DIXON, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 10-16 and 23-25. Claims 17, 21, and 22 have been
indicated as allowable; and claims 1-9, 18-20, and 26-30 have
been canceled. See paper number 7, dated September 4, 2002,
which indicates the amendment filed August 23, 2002, will be
entered upon the filing of this appeal.1
1 Although we are treating it as such for the purposes of this
appeal, the August 23, 2002, amendment has not yet been formally
entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007