Appeal No. 2004-0459 Serial No. 09/652,997 rubber (12) to prevent a portion (5b) of the packing sheet from being bonded to the inner liner rubber when the tire is vulcanized (pages 6, 8-10, 12, 13). Kuan discloses forming a pocket which is attached to the sidewall of a tire and contains a lubricant (abstract). The pocket is formed by Harrington’s method (Harrington, col. 2, lines 53-68) wherein a strip of release material which conforms to the width and length of the pocket is placed between inner liners before the tire is vulcanized (Kuan, col. 2, lines 17-39). Case discloses a method for preventing a tire tread inner layer (3) from adhering to an inner tube (6) during vulcanization by placing between the tread inner layer and the tube a fabric which will not bond to the inner layer during vulcanization (page 1, lines 57-66). The teachings of Honda, Kuan, Harrington and Case would have fairly suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, placing an anti-adhesive sheet on the lower surface of O’Brien’s indented tire segment around its circumference prior to vulcanization so that the surface under the anti-adhesive sheet does not bond to the rubber above the sheet during vulcanization and that therefore, the desired chamber is formed. The appellants argue that O’Brien is a parent of the present application and is not prior art (brief, pages 6-8; reply brief, 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007