Ex Parte MIAN et al - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2004-0615                                                        
          Application No. 08/761,063                                                  

                    wherein a volume of a fluid within the microchannels of           
               the platform is moved through said microchannels by                    
               centripetal force arising from rotational motion of the                
               platform for a time and a rotational velocity sufficient to            
               move the fluid through the microchannels.                              

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Cottingham                         5,639,428       Jun. 17, 1997            
          (filed Jul. 19, 1994)                                                       
          Zaffaroni et al. (Zaffaroni)       6,121,048       Sep. 19, 2000            
          (filed Oct. 18, 1994)                                                       
          Takase et al. (Takase)           0 417 305 A1      Mar. 20, 1991            
               (European patent application)                                          
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-56, 64-70, 78-81 and 84 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Takase in view of                
          Cottingham and Zaffaroni.                                                   
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejection.                                
               The appellants state that all of the claims stand or fall              
          with claims 1-3 (brief, page 5).  The appellants, however, do not           
          argue the separate patentability of claims 1-3.  Consequently,              
          the claims stand or fall together and we limit our discussion to            
          one claim, i.e., claim 1.  See In re Ochiai, 71 F.3d 1565, 1566             
          n.2, 37 USPQ2d 1127, 1129 n.2 (Fed. Cir. 1995); 37 CFR                      
          § 1.192(c)(7)(1997).                                                        


                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007