Ex Parte Mulligan et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2004-0999                                                        
          Application No. 09/997,086                                                  

          1.   A method of dicing a microelectronic device wafer,                     
          comprising:                                                                 
                providing a microelectronic device wafer comprising a                 
          semiconductor wafer having an interconnect layer disposed                   
          thereon, said microelectronic device including at least two                 
          integrated circuits formed therein separated by at least one                
          dicing street;                                                              
                forming at least one trench through said interconnect layer           
          within said at least one dicing street;                                     
                cutting through said semiconductor wafer within said at               
          least one dicing street.   REFERENCES                                       
                The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:              
          Mori                     5,024,970           Jun. 18, 1991                  
          Igarashi et al.          6,306,731           Oct. 23, 2001                  
          (Igarashi)                         (filed Apr.  3, 2000)                    
          Ibnabdeljalil et al.     6,365,958           Apr.  2, 2002                  
          (Ibnabdeljalil)                    (filed Jan. 21, 1999)                    
                                                                                     
          Kroeninger et al.  DE 198 40 508 A1     Dec.  2, 1999                       
          (Kroeninger)                                                                
          Stanley Wolf "Silicon Processing for the VSLI Era" Volume 1,                
          Lattice Press 1986, Chapter 16.                                             
                                 REJECTIONS AT ISSUE                                  
               Claims 1, 3, 5-9, 11, 13, and 14 stand rejected under                  
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Ibnabdeljalil in view of              
          Mori.  Claims 2 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
          being obvious over Ibnabdeljalil in view of Mori and further in             
          view of Kroeninger.  Claims 4 and 12 stand rejected under                   
                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007