Ex Parte Mulligan et al - Page 13



          Appeal No. 2004-0999                                                        
          Application No. 09/997,086                                                  

                            Rejection of Claims 2 and 10                              
               Dependent claims 2 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being obvious over Ibnabdeljalil in view of Mori and further             
          in view of Kroeninger.  We find that Kroeninger teaches the use             
          of laser cutting to form trenches as Examiner pointed out on page           
          7 of the answer.  However, Kroeninger does not teach the forming            
          at least one trench through an interconnect layer as Appellants             
          defined.  Therefore, we will not sustain the rejection of claims            
          2 and 10.                                                                   
                            Rejection of Claims 4 and 12                              
               Dependent claims 4 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103           
          as being obvious over Ibnabdeljalil in view of Mori and further             
          in view of Wolf.  We find that Wolf teaches plasma etching to               
          form trenches as Examiner pointed out on page 8 of the answer.              
          However, Wolf does not teach the forming at least one trench                
          through an interconnect layer as Appellants defined.  Therefore,            
          we will not sustain the rejection of these claims 4 and 12.                 





                                          13                                          




Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007