Appeal No. 2004-0999
Application No. 09/997,086
least one dicing street" required in claim 18. Therefore, we
will not sustain the rejection of claim 18.
In view of the foregoing, we have not sustained the
Examiner's rejection of claims 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
REVERSED
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
MRF: lbg
17
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007