Appeal No. 2004-1280 Page 14
Application No. 09/630,938
being unpatentable over Giese in view of Tong or in view of Brown and Thomas, claim
11 as being unpatentable over Giese in view of Tong or in view of Brown and Thomas
and further in view of Kendall, claims 26-30 and 35-38 as being unpatentable over
Giese in view of Tong or in view of Brown and Thomas and further in view of Crowley
and claims 30 and 31 as being unpatentable over Giese in view of Tong or in view of
Brown and Thomas and further in view of Crowley and Cameron or Barre are reversed.
The examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007