Ex Parte Levin - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written           
                                for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                 Paper No. 10                 
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                                __________                                                    
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                __________                                                    
                                         Ex parte GILBERT V. LEVIN                                            
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 2004-1391                                              
                                          Application No. 09/811,654                                          
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WINTERS, GRIMES, and GREEN, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
                GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 1-7, all of the claims remaining.  Claims 1 and 7 are               
                representative and read as follows:                                                           
                      1.     A method for promoting cardiovascular health in a mammal in a                    
                             need of such treatment comprising administering to said mammal                   
                             an efficacious amount of tagatose to raise the HDL level in the                  
                             mammal.                                                                          
                      7.     The method of claim 1 wherein the tagatose is D-tagatose,                        
                             L-tagatose, or a mixture of the two isomers.                                     









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007