The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KAZUE TAKAHASHI,
TOSHIO MASUDA,
TETSUNORI KAJI,
and KEN’ETSU YOKOGAWA
______________
Appeal No. 2004-2192
Application 09/414,520
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before TIMM, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative
Patent Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9, and 10.
A copy of each of these claims is set forth in the attached
appendix.
On page 6 of the brief, appellants state that the claims do
not stand or fall together. To the extent any one claim is
argued separately for patentability, we will consider such claim
in this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007