Barton et al or Fischhoff et al v. Adang et al. - Page 46




          Interference 103,781                                                        

               ingestion by Manduca sexta, the protein coding sequence of             
               the gene including a 5' region of at least 150 nucleotides             
               in length constructed from nucleotide codons selected from             
               those codons determined from Figure 1 to be efficiently                
               expressed in the cells of plants, the sequence of codons               
               being different from those in the protein coding sequence              
               of the gene in Bacillus thuringiensis.                                 
          Adang and Fischhoff point to generic teachings at least as broad            
          in scope as their broadest claims designated as corresponding to            
          Count 2 and the same Shaw and Wickens publications in support of            
          the respective dates each allegedly conceived of the invention of           
          Count 2.  Conception is “a specific, settled idea, a particular             
          solution to the problem at hand, not just a general goal or                 
          research plan he hopes to pursue.”  Burroughs Wellcome Co. v.               
          Barr Labs., Inc., 40 F.3d 1223, 1228, 32 USPQ2d 1915, 1919 (Fed.            
          Cir. 1994).  However, “one need not necessarily meet the                    
          enablement standard of 35 U.S.C. § 112 to prove conception.”                
          Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 40 F.3d at 1231,                
          32 USPQ2d at 1922.  For conception, “[t]he question is not                  
          whether Burroughs Wellcome reasonably believed that the                     
          inventions would work for their intended purpose . . . but                  
          whether the inventors had formed the idea of their use for that             
          purpose in sufficiently final form that only the exercise of                
          ordinary skill remained to reduce it to practice.”  Id.  The                
          inventor need not know that the invention will work for                     
          conception to be complete.  Id. at 1228-29, 32 USPQ2d at 1919-20.           

                                        -46-                                          





Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007