Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
The counts
6. Count 4 reads as follows (Paper 81 at 3):
A method according to any of claims 19 or 23
of Campbell application 09/650,194.
7. Count 5 reads as follows (Paper 81 at 3):
A method according to any of claims 27 or 31
of Campbell application 09/650,194.
8. Count 6 reads as follows (Paper 81 at 3):
A method according to claim 35, claim 39,
claim 43 or claim 47 of Campbell application
09/650,194, where the "non-human mammal" is a
pig or a porcine and where the "non-human
mammalian fetus" is a pig fetus or a porcine
fetus.
9. Claim 23 of Campbell reads as follows:
A method of cloning a bovine fetus by nuclear
transfer comprising:
(i) inserting a nucleus of a cultured
diploid bovine fibroblast in the G1 phase of the
cell cycle into an unactivated, enucleated
metaphase II-arrested bovine oocyte to reconstruct
an embryo;
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007