Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
(ii) maintaining the reconstructed embryo
without activation for a sufficient time to allow
the reconstructed embryo to become capable of
developing to term;
(iii) activating the resultant reconstructed
embryo;
(iv) culturing said activated, reconstructed
embryo to blastocyst; and
(v) transferring said cultured,
reconstructed embryo to a host cow such that the
reconstructed embryo develops into a fetus.
10. The other Campbell claims referred to in the counts are
independent claims that are also directed to methods of cloning
by nuclear transfer comprising the same overall steps as Campbell
claim 23. The following differences are noted:
(a) Campbell claim 19 is directed to a method of
cloning a cow.
(b) Campbell claim 27 is directed to a method of
cloning a sheep.
(c) Campbell claim 31 is directed to a method of
cloning an ovine fetus.
(d) Campbell claim 35 is directed to a method of
cloning a non-human mammal.
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007