Interference 104,746 Paper 123
Stice v. Campbell
38. Stice urges that it achieved an actual reduction to
practice of subject matter within the scope of Count 4 on or
about 30 August 1996, as shown by an entry in a notebook
maintained by Cibelli. (Paper 115 at 21.)
39. Stice characterizes the actual reduction to practice as
one in which "successful nuclear transfer fusions using
differentiated fibroblast cells were completed leading to viable
offsprings." (Paper 115 at 21.)
40. The summary for activities of 30 August 1996 refers to
pregnancies of "7/30/96." (Paper 115 at 20.)
41. There is no entry in the summary table for
30 July 1996.
42. Stice, in its principal brief, has not directed our
attention to any expert testimony that explains any of the
summaries of Cibelli's notebooks, nor how the summaries relate to
any of the counts in this interference.
43. Stice, in its principal brief, has not made any
arguments relating the evidence on which it ultimately relies to
support its actual reduction to practice, namely Cibelli's
notebooks, SX 2057 and SX 2058, to the limitations of any of the
counts.
44. Stice, in its principal brief, has not directed our
attention to any expert testimony explaining the significance of
-11-
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007