Ex Parte LEE et al - Page 2




             Appeal No. 2003-2147                                                                              
             Application No. 09/392,243                                                                        
                   42.  The method of claim 36, the method further comprising mixing the peroxide-             
             containing compound and the mucosa tissue to form a mucosa product, the                           
             concentration of the peroxide-containing compound remaining in the mucosa product                 
             being undetectable when the concentration of the peroxide-containing compound in the              
             mucosa product is determined using KMnO4 titration.                                               
                   The prior art references cited by the examiner are:                                         
             Van Gorp et al (Van Gorp)              5,607,840                 Mar. 4, 1997                     
             Balslev et al (Balslev)                4,438,100                 Mar. 20, 1984                    
             Oles                                   4,415,451                 Mar. 20, 1979                    
                   Reference cited by the Merits Panel:                                                        
             Hiles et al. (Hiles)                   6,666,892                 Dec. 23, 2003                    
                                (filed May 27, 1999)                                                           
             Grounds of Rejection                                                                              
                   Claim 42 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  §112, second paragraph for                        
             indefiniteness.                                                                                   
                   Claims 21-27 and 36-54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.  §103(a), as obvious                  
             over Van Gorp in view of Balslev and Oles.                                                        
                   We reverse these rejections.                                                                


                                                DISCUSSION                                                     

             35 U.S.C.  §112, second paragraph                                                                 
                   Claim 42 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.  §112, second paragraph for                        
             indefiniteness.                                                                                   



                                                      2                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007