Appeal No. 2003-2147 Application No. 09/392,243 prior to the filing date of the present application, September 9, 1999. Hiles discloses the treatment of tissue mucosa with a disinfecting agent which is desirably an oxidizing agent, and preferably hydrogen peroxide. Col. 4, lines 44-67. Hiles states that the process will eliminate contaminants but will also produce a tissue which “exhibits no substantial degradation of physical and mechanical properties,” i.e., the tissue will be preserved. (Col. 7, lines 1-8). CONCLUSION The rejection of claim 42 under 35 U.S.C. §112, second paragraph for indefiniteness is reversed. The rejection of claims 21-27 and 36-54 under 35 U.S.C. §103(a), as obvious in view of Van Gorp in view of Balslev and Oles is reversed. The application is returned to the examiner to determine the relevance of Hiles to the claimed subject matter. 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007