Ex Parte Roman - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for   
                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                                       Paper No. 15          
                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                           
                                         ____________                                        
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                               
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                      
                                         ____________                                        
                                   Ex parte EDGAR M. ROMAN                                   
                                         ____________                                        
                                    Appeal No. 2004-0717                                     
                                 Application No. 10/099,605                                  
                                         ____________                                        
                                           ON BRIEF                                          
                                         ____________                                        
          Before THOMAS, LEVY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                 

                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                      
                This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                  
          examiner's final rejection of claims 1-20, which are all of the                    
          claims pending in this application1.                                               








                1 Examiner’s Answer (p. 3) has dropped the rejection of                      
          claim 4, the only claims 1-3 and 5-20 remain on appeal.                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007