Appeal No. 2004-0717
Application No. 10/099,605 Page 13
We next turn to the rejection of claims 1-3 and 5-20 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goldberg in view of
Kobayashi and further in view of Pearson. We affirm the
rejection of claims 1-3, 5-18 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a),
because we find the teachings of Kobayashi and Pearson to be
cumulative to the teachings of Goldberg.
CONCLUSION
Claims 1-3 and 5-20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007