Ex Parte Roman - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-0717                                                               
          Application No. 10/099,605                                       Page 2            

                                         BACKGROUND                                          
                Appellant’s invention relates to a system and method for                     
          dynamically switching optical character recognition packages.  An                  
          understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of                    
          exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as follows:                                 
                1. A method for electronically scanning images of text                       
          documents into memory, comprising:                                                 
                capturing an image of a document via a scanning device;                      
                presenting an interface configured to enable dynamic                         
          application of a select optical character recognition (OCR)                        
          package, wherein the select OCR package is one of a plurality of                   
          OCR packages;                                                                      
                indicating which of the plurality of OCR packages is the                     
          select OCR package; and                                                            
                analyzing said image with the select OCR package.                            
                The prior art references of record relied upon by the                        
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                     
          Kobayashi et al.              4,757,551          Jul. 12, 1988                     
          (Kobayashi)                                                                        
          Pearson et al.                5,627,997          May   6, 1997                     
          (Pearson)                                                                          
          Meier et al.                  6,058,393          May   2, 2000                     
          (Meier)                                                                            
          Goldberg                      6,219,453          Apr. 17, 2001                     
          Lim et al.                    6,272,557          Aug.  7, 2001                     
          (Lim)                                                                              
                Claims 1-3 and 5-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                  
          as being unpatentable over Goldberg.                                               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007