Appeal No. 2004-0717
Application No. 10/099,605 Page 3
Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12-16 and 20 stand rejected2 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goldberg.
Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12-16 and 20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Goldberg in view of
Kobayashi.
Claims 1-3 and 5-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Goldberg in view of Kobayashi and
further in view of Pearson.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Goldberg.
Claim 19 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Goldberg in view of Kobayashi, Pearson and
Meier.
2 From the first two statement of rejection, it is unclear
as to why the examiner lists two different groups of overlapping
claims as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) over
Goldberg.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007