The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DOUGLAS ROBERT CASE, DAVID DERK, JAMES MICHAEL DILE,
ROBERT CLAIR EDWARDS JR., AVISHAI HAIM HOCHBERG, DAVID T. KWAN,
THOMAS FRANKLIN RAMKE JR., PETE TANENHAUS, RANDY TUNG,
JOHN VIKSNE, BRETT WALKER and HUI-LAN WEN
____________
Appeal No. 2004-2102
Application No. 09/191,256
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, LEVY, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-22.
Invention
Appellants’ invention relates to a system and method for
remotely accessing a client from numerous machines and different
platforms that requires no special software. This distributed
client facility accomplishes a remote invocation of the client
operations through a web browser such as Netscape Navigator or
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007