Appeal No. 2004-2102 Application No. 09/191,256 For the reasons above, we find that the Examiner has not met the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. Conclusion In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-22. REVERSED JAMES D. THOMAS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) )BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS ) AND STUART S. LEVY ) INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ALLEN R. MACDONALD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ARM/lbg 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007