Appeal No. 2004-2102
Application No. 09/191,256
the server. Appellants’ specification at page 5, line 16,
through page 7, line 3.
Claim 1 is representative of the claimed invention and is
reproduced as follows:
1. A system for remotely accessing a client in a client-server
system comprising:
a browser for requesting remote access;
a client machine further comprised of a listening program
configured to be responsive to requests for remote access from
the browser, establish direct communications therewith, and
invoke a client agent for communicating with the browser and a
server machine.
References
The references relied on by the Examiner are as follows:
Kalajan 5,941,954 Aug. 24, 1999
Scherpbier 5,944,791 Aug. 31, 1999
Rejections At Issue
Claims 1-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
obvious over the combination of Scherpbier and Kalajan.
Throughout our opinion, we make references to the
Appellants’ briefs,1 and to the Examiner’s Answer for the
respective details thereof.
1
1Appellants filed an appeal brief on January 30, 2004 replacing
the brief filed November 11, 2003. Appellants filed a reply
brief on May 20, 2004. The Examiner mailed an Examiner’s Answer
on March 16, 2004.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007