Appeal No. 2004-2354 Application No. 09/923,991 Page 16 Because Jordan’s enclosure is filled with cellular foam saturated with a liquid, the examiner recognizes that Jordan does not teach a plurality of matrix elements disposed together with a liquid in an enclosure as required by claims 5, 6, 11, 13, 15 and 17. Thus, the examiner relies on Moore for allegedly showing a matrix that includes a plurality of elements shaped as claimed herein. See page 8 of the answer and column 2, lines 33-68 and column 3, lines 15-68 of Moore as referred to by the examiner. The examiner maintains that (answer, pages 8 and 9): it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was made to have provided a crushable matrix which has a plurality of matrix elements selected from the group consisting of cylinders, hemispheres or pyramids, wherein the crushable matrix includes a plurality of hemispheres, and said hemispheres disposed in pairs connected at the convexities in the trauma mitigation device of Jordan in order to provide improved impact resistance as taught or suggested by Moore. Jordan and Moore disclose the claimed invention except for the inclusion of pyramids which are disposed in pairs connected at the apexes recited in claim 17. However, Moore teaches the inclusion of a plurality of hemispheres disposed in pairs connected at the convexities as just described above. Furthermore, Moore teaches that these hemispheres can be of any desired shape (column 3, lines 30-42). Further, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to have provided a trauma mitigation device including pyramids which are disposed in pairs connected at the apexes, since it has been held that a change in shape involves only routine skill in the art (applies to instant claimPage: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007