Ex Parte Sereboff - Page 16



          Appeal No. 2004-2354                                                        
          Application No. 09/923,991                                Page 16           

               Because Jordan’s enclosure is filled with cellular foam                
          saturated with a liquid, the examiner recognizes that Jordan does           
          not teach a plurality of matrix elements disposed together with a           
          liquid in an enclosure as required by claims 5, 6, 11, 13, 15 and           
          17.  Thus, the examiner relies on Moore for allegedly showing a             
          matrix that includes a plurality of elements shaped as claimed              
          herein.  See page 8 of the answer and column 2, lines 33-68 and             
          column 3, lines 15-68 of Moore as referred to by the examiner.              
          The examiner maintains that (answer, pages 8 and 9):                        
                    it would have been obvious to one of ordinary                     
               skill in the art at the time applicant’s invention was                 
               made to have provided a crushable matrix which has a                   
               plurality of matrix elements selected from the group                   
               consisting of cylinders, hemispheres or pyramids,                      
               wherein the crushable matrix includes a plurality of                   
               hemispheres, and said hemispheres disposed in pairs                    
               connected at the convexities in the trauma mitigation                  
               device of Jordan in order to provide improved impact                   
               resistance as taught or suggested by Moore.                            
                    Jordan and Moore disclose the claimed invention                   
               except for the inclusion of pyramids which are disposed                
               in pairs connected at the apexes recited in claim 17.                  
               However, Moore teaches the inclusion of a plurality of                 
               hemispheres disposed in pairs connected at the                         
               convexities as just described above.  Furthermore,                     
               Moore teaches that these hemispheres can be of any                     
               desired shape (column 3, lines 30-42).  Further, it                    
               would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in                
               the art at the time the invention was made to have                     
               provided a trauma mitigation device including pyramids                 
               which are disposed in pairs connected at the apexes,                   
               since it has been held that a change in shape involves                 
               only routine skill in the art (applies to instant claim                






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007