Appeal No. 2004-2354
Application No. 09/923,991 Page 19
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 and 21 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Jordan; to reject
claims 4 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Jordan; to reject claims 2 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Jordan in view of Courtney; and to reject
Claim 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Jordan in view of Sobel is affirmed. The decision of the
examiner to reject claims 5, 6, 11, 13, 15 and 17 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jordan in view of Moore; to
reject claims 7-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Jordan in view of Moore and Jensen; to reject claim 12 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Jordan in view of
Moore and Sobel; to reject claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Jordan in view of Moore and Weller; and
to reject claim 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable
over Jordan in view of Weller is reversed.
Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007