Appeal No. 2005-0181
Application No. 09/781,631
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Hanyu is affirmed.
The rejection of claim 43 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by, or in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being obvious over Hanyu is reversed, pro forma.
The rejection of claims 45, 47, and 49-51 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being obvious over Hanyu is affirmed. However, we
reverse this rejection, pro forma, with respect to claim 48.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective Sept. 13, 2003; 69 Fed. Reg. 49960
(Aug. 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat., Office 21 (Sept. 7, 2004)).
AFFIRMED
Charles F. Warren )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Romulo H. Delmendo ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
Beverly A. Pawlikowski )
Administrative Patent Judge )
BAP/cam
-19-
Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007